Mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the sentence that best combines each pair of sentences in...

Mỗi ngày sự đa dạng của sự sống trên Trái Đất trở nên nghèo nàn đi. Chúng ta đang dùng quá mức các nguồn tài nguyên và không quan tâm đến sự giàu có của thiên nhiên.

A. Sự đa dạng của sự sống trên Trái Đất trở nên nghèo nàn đi mỗi ngày bởi vì việc sử dụng quá mức các nguồn tài nguyên của chúng ta và không quan tâm đến sự dồi giàu của tự nhiên.

B. Câu này không chọn được vì hai mệnh đề không cùng chủ ngữ nên không được rút gọn về dạng Ving mà phải dùng

Every day the diversity of life on Earth gets poorer, which leads to overusing resources and disregarding the riches of nature.

C. Mỗi ngày sự đa dạng của sự sống trên Trái Đất trở nên nghèo nàn đi, để đáp lại việc sử dụng quá mức các nguồn tài nguyên và không quan tâm đến sự dồi giàu của thiên nhiên.

D. Mặc dù chúng ta đang sử dụng quá mức các nguồn tài nguyên và không quan tâm đến sự dồi giàu của thiên nhiên, nhưng sự đa dạng của sự sống trên Trái Đất trở nên nghèo nàn đi mỗi ngày. => sai nghĩa => loại

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

31 tháng 1 2018

Mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the sentences that combines each pair of sentences in the following questions. The 2022 FIFA World Cup is an important competition in international football. Almost everyone around the world is looking forward to it. A. The 2022 FIFA World Cup is so important a competition in international football that almost everyone around the world is looking forward to it B. The 2022 FIFA World Cup is too important a competition in...

Đọc tiếp

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

31 tháng 1 2018

Kiến thức: Cấu trúc “too, so, such”

Giải thích:

Cấu trúc với “so”: S + be + so + adj + that + S + V + …: quá … đến nỗi

Đảo ngữ với “so”: So + adj + be + N + clause

B. Cấu trúc với “too”: S + be + too + adj (for somebody) + to V => Câu A sai.

C. Câu C sai do thiếu tân ngữ “it” ở mệnh đề “that”.

D. Cấu trúc với “such”: S + V + such + (a/an) + adj + noun + that + S + V => Câu D sai do thiếu mạo từ “an”.

Tạm dịch: FIFA World Cup 2022 là một cuộc thi đấu quan trọng trong bóng đá quốc tế đến nỗi hầu như tất cả mọi người trên thế giới đều mong chờ nó.

Chọn A

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

26 tháng 7 2018

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. ENDANGERED SPECIES There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

Which of the following is the main topic of the passage?

A. The beauty of the world

B. The quality of life

C. The preservation of species

D. The balance of nature

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

26 tháng 7 2018

Chọn C.

Đáp án C.

Dịch câu hỏi: Điều nào sau đây là chủ đề chính của đoạn văn?

A. Vẻ đẹp của thế giới

B. Chất lượng cuộc sống

C. Bảo tồn các loài

D. Sự cân bằng của thiên nhiên

Để xác định “main topic” của một đoạn văn, ta phải xác định được mỗi đoan văn nhỏ trong bài nói về cái gì => từ đó suy ra mạch suy luận/logic của toàn bài và ý tác giả muốn hướng tới người đọc.

Ở đây, đoạn 1 tác giả nói có “three arguments“ liên quan tới “preservation of endangered species”. Đoạn 2 là một “another argument", và đoan 3 là ý kiến về một argument khác. Như vậy toàn bài là phân tích 3 argument về preservation of endangered species. => đáp án C là chính xác.

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

27 tháng 12 2017

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self–interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called "deep ecology", the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

(Source: Adapted from Reading Practice for the TOEFL)

Which of the arguments supports animal rights?

A. Self–interest argument

B. Aesthetic justification

C. Moral justification

D. Ecological argument

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

27 tháng 12 2017

Chọn C

Kiến thức: Đọc hiểu

Giải thích:

Lập luận nào ủng hộ quyền động vật?

A. Lập luận về lợi ích cá nhân

B. Lý lẽ về mặt thẩm mỹ

C. Lý lẽ về mặt đạo đức

D. Lập luận sinh thái

Thông tin: Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982.

Tạm dịch: Ngoài lợi ích cho con người về cả thẩm mỹ và sinh thái, những người đề xướng lý lẽ về mặt đạo đức cho rằng tất cả các loài đều có quyền tồn tại, đó là một quan điểm đã được nêu trong Hiến chương về Tự nhiên của Liên hợp quốc viết năm 1982

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

28 tháng 12 2018

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. ENDANGERED SPECIES There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

Which of the arguments supports animal rights?

A. Aesthetic justification

B. Ecological argument

C. Self-interest argument

D. Moral justification

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

28 tháng 12 2018

Chọn D.

Đáp án D.

Tìm từ rights/animal rights => thấy ở dòng 17 “moral justification contend that all species have the right...”

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

27 tháng 11 2019

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. ENDANGERED SPECIES There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

The word “perspective” in paragraph 3 could best be replaced by __________.

A. ideal

B. event

C. truth

D. view

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

27 tháng 11 2019

Chọn D.

Đáp án D.

Dịch câu hỏi: Từ " perspective" trong đoạn 3 có thể được thay thế bằng __________.

A. ý tưởng B. sự kiện C. sự thật D. quan điểm

=> perspective = view

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

6 tháng 4 2017

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. ENDANGERED SPECIES There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

The author mentions all of the following as justifications for the protection of endangered species EXCEPT ___________.

A. the natural compounds needed for medicines

B. the intrinsic value of the beauty of nature

C. the control of pollution in the biosphere

D. the right to life implied by their existence

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

6 tháng 4 2017

Chọn C.

Đáp án C.

Dịch câu hỏi: Tác giả đề cập đến tất cả những điều sau đây như là biện minh cho việc bảo vệ các loài nguy cấp tuyệt chủng NGOẠI TRỪ _________

A. có thể tìm thấy ở đoạn 2.

B. có thể thấy ở dòng 2-3

D. có thể thấy ở dòng 17 “the right to exist”.

Riêng đáp án C “sự kiểm soát ô nhiễm” là điều không được nhắc tới trong toàn bài.

Đúng(0)

LQ

Lê Quỳnh Anh

9 tháng 1 2018

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self–interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called "deep ecology", the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

(Source: Adapted from Reading Practice for the TOEFL)

It can be inferred from the passage that the author _________.

A. is a member of the "deep ecology" movement

B. does not agree with ecological self–interest

C. supports all of the arguments to protect species

D. participated in drafting the Chapter for Nature

#Mẫu giáo

1

DH

Dương Hoàn Anh

9 tháng 1 2018

Chọn C

Kiến thức: Đọc hiểu

Giải thích:

Có thể suy ra từ đoạn văn rằng tác giả _______.

A. là một thành viên của phong trào "sinh thái sâu sắc"

B. không đồng ý với lợi ích sinh thái

C. ủng hộ tất cả các lý lẽ để bảo vệ các loài

D. tham gia soạn thảo Hiến chương về Tự nhiên

Đúng(0)

Chúng tôi đề xuất

Tài nguyên

Ứng dụng mobile

Bảng xếp hạng

Các khóa học có thể bạn quan tâm

Yêu cầu VIP