K
Khách

Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.

13 tháng 3 2017

Chọn đáp án B

Giải thích: đây là câu bị động dạng đặc biệt. “believe” (hiện tại) và “carried” (quá khứ) => lệch thì=> to have PII

*NOTE: Công thức của câu bị động dạng đặc biệt

1. Khi V1 chia ở các thì hiện tại như hiện tại đơn, hiện tại tiếp diễn, hiện tại hoàn thành.

S1 + V1 + that + S2 + V + …

* TH1: It is + V1-pII that + S2 + V + …

* TH2: Khi V2 chia ở thì hiện tại đơn hoặc tương lai đơn

S2 + is/am/are + V1-pII + to + V2(nguyên thể) +….

* TH3: Khi V2 chia ở thì quá khứ đơn hoặc hiện tại hoàn hành

S2 + is/am/are + V1-pII + to have + V2-PII + …

Ex: They think that she works very hard.

-> It is thought that she works very hard.

-> She is thought to work very hard.

2. Khi V1 chia ở các thì quá khứ (quá khứ đơn, quá khứ tiếp diễn, quá khứ hoàn thành).

S1 + V1 + that + S2 + V + ….

* TH1: It was + V1-pII + that + S2 + V + …

* TH2: Khi V2 chia ở thì quá khứ đơn:

S2 + was/were + V1-pII + to + V2 (nguyên thể) + …

* TH3: Khi V2 chia ở thì quá khứ hoàn thành:

S2 + was/ were + V1-pII + to + have + V2-pII + …

Ex: People said that she was very kind.

-> It was said that she was very kind.

-> She was said to be very kind.

Dịch nghĩa: Họ tin rằng một tay sung đã gây ra vụ tấn công.

19 tháng 7 2018

Đáp án D

Giải thích:

A. Phụ nữ có bảo hiểm gần như gấp hai lần nam có bảo hiểm

B. Nhiều nam hơn nữ có bảo hiểm

C. Bảo hiểm được bán cho nữ thì khó bán gấp đôi so với

D. Số đại lí bảo hiểm nam nhiều hơn số bảo hiểm nữ (câu này không có nhắc tới 2 lần nhưng chỉ có câu này là hợp nghĩa) 

Dịch nghĩa: Số đại lý bảo hiểm nam gấp 2 lần số đại lí bảo hiểm nữ

26 tháng 8 2019

Chọn A

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix. The difference was that only 2,000 cars a day ran down Octavia Street (LIGHT street, in Appleyard’s terminology) while Gough Street (MEDIUM street) was used by 8,000 cars daily, and Franklin Street (HEAVY street) had around 16,000 cars a day. Franklin Street often had as many cars in an hour as Octavia had in a day.
          Heavy traffic brought with it danger, noise, fumes and soot, directly, and trash secondarily. That is, the cars didn’t bring in much trash, but when trash accumulated, residents seldom picked it up. The cars, Appleyard determined, reduced the amount of territory residents felt responsible for. Noise was a constant intrusion into their homes. Many Franklin Street residents covered their doors and windows and spent most of their time in the rear of their houses. Most

families with children had already left.
          Conditions on Octavia Street were much different. Residents picked up trash. They sat on their front steps and chatted with neighbors. They had three times as many friends and twice as many acquaintances as the people on Franklin.
          On Gough Street, residents said that the old feeling of community was disappearing as traffic increased. People were becoming more and more preoccupied with their own lives. A number of families had recently moved and more were considering. Those who were staying expressed deep regret at the destruction of their community.

Approximately how many cars used Franklin Street daily?

A. 2,000    

B. 8,000      

C. 16,000   

D. 20,000

1
8 tháng 4 2018

Đáp án C

Có khoảng bao nhiêu phương tiện dùng đường Franklin mỗi ngày?
A. 2,000
B. 8,000
C. 16,000
D. 20,000
Như đã nhắc ở trên, đường Franklin có 16,000 xe lưu thông mỗi ngày

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix. The difference was that only 2,000 cars a day ran down Octavia Street (LIGHT street, in Appleyard’s terminology) while Gough Street (MEDIUM street) was used by 8,000 cars daily, and Franklin Street (HEAVY street) had around 16,000 cars a day. Franklin Street often had as many cars in an hour as Octavia had in a day.
          Heavy traffic brought with it danger, noise, fumes and soot, directly, and trash secondarily. That is, the cars didn’t bring in much trash, but when trash accumulated, residents seldom picked it up. The cars, Appleyard determined, reduced the amount of territory residents felt responsible for. Noise was a constant intrusion into their homes. Many Franklin Street residents covered their doors and windows and spent most of their time in the rear of their houses. Most

families with children had already left.
          Conditions on Octavia Street were much different. Residents picked up trash. They sat on their front steps and chatted with neighbors. They had three times as many friends and twice as many acquaintances as the people on Franklin.
          On Gough Street, residents said that the old feeling of community was disappearing as traffic increased. People were becoming more and more preoccupied with their own lives. A number of families had recently moved and more were considering. Those who were staying expressed deep regret at the destruction of their community.

The author’s main purpose in the second paragraph is to __________.

A. discuss the problem of trash disposal

B. point out the disadvantage of heavy traffic

C. propose an alternate system of transportation

D. suggest ways to cope with traffic problems

1
22 tháng 10 2017

Đáp án B

Mục đích chính của tác giả trong đoạn 2 là ______________
A. bàn luận vấn đề xử lí rác thải.
B. chỉ ra điểm bất lợi của giao thông đông đúc.
C. đề xuất hệ thống giao thông thay thế.
D. gợi ý phương hướng giải quyết vấn đề giao thông.
Đoạn 2 chủ yếu nói về mối nguy hại mà giao thông đông đúc đưa lại, những tác động đến người dân và hệ quả sau đó (nhiều gia đình phải chuyển đi).

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix. The difference was that only 2,000 cars a day ran down Octavia Street (LIGHT street, in Appleyard’s terminology) while Gough Street (MEDIUM street) was used by 8,000 cars daily, and Franklin Street (HEAVY street) had around 16,000 cars a day. Franklin Street often had as many cars in an hour as Octavia had in a day.
          Heavy traffic brought with it danger, noise, fumes and soot, directly, and trash secondarily. That is, the cars didn’t bring in much trash, but when trash accumulated, residents seldom picked it up. The cars, Appleyard determined, reduced the amount of territory residents felt responsible for. Noise was a constant intrusion into their homes. Many Franklin Street residents covered their doors and windows and spent most of their time in the rear of their houses. Most

families with children had already left.
          Conditions on Octavia Street were much different. Residents picked up trash. They sat on their front steps and chatted with neighbors. They had three times as many friends and twice as many acquaintances as the people on Franklin.
          On Gough Street, residents said that the old feeling of community was disappearing as traffic increased. People were becoming more and more preoccupied with their own lives. A number of families had recently moved and more were considering. Those who were staying expressed deep regret at the destruction of their community.

In what order does the author present detailed discussions of the three streets?

A. LIGHT, MEDIUM, HEAVY

B. HEAVY, MEDIUM, LIGHT

C. HEAVY, LIGHT, MEDIUM 

D. LIGHT, HEAVY, M

1
6 tháng 10 2019

Đáp án C

Tác giả bàn luận chi tiết về 3 loại đường theo thứ tự nào?
A. LIGHT, MEDIUM, HEAVY
B. HEAVY, MEDIUM, LIGHT
C. HEAVY, LIGHT, MEDIUM
D. LIGHT, HEAVY, MEDIUM
Đọc bài ta có thể thấy, HEAVY Street được nhắc ở cuối đoạn 2, sau đó là LIGHT Street ở đoạn 3 và MEDIUM Street đoạn cuối. Như vậy thứ tự là C.

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix. The difference was that only 2,000 cars a day ran down Octavia Street (LIGHT street, in Appleyard’s terminology) while Gough Street (MEDIUM street) was used by 8,000 cars daily, and Franklin Street (HEAVY street) had around 16,000 cars a day. Franklin Street often had as many cars in an hour as Octavia had in a day.
          Heavy traffic brought with it danger, noise, fumes and soot, directly, and trash secondarily. That is, the cars didn’t bring in much trash, but when trash accumulated, residents seldom picked it up. The cars, Appleyard determined, reduced the amount of territory residents felt responsible for. Noise was a constant intrusion into their homes. Many Franklin Street residents covered their doors and windows and spent most of their time in the rear of their houses. Most

families with children had already left.
          Conditions on Octavia Street were much different. Residents picked up trash. They sat on their front steps and chatted with neighbors. They had three times as many friends and twice as many acquaintances as the people on Franklin.
          On Gough Street, residents said that the old feeling of community was disappearing as traffic increased. People were becoming more and more preoccupied with their own lives. A number of families had recently moved and more were considering. Those who were staying expressed deep regret at the destruction of their community.

The word “astounding” in line 1 is closest in meaning to

A. startling 

B. disappointing   

C. dubious  

D. alternative

1
2 tháng 8 2017

Đáp án A

Từ “astounding” ở dòng 1 gần nghĩa nhất với _________
A. giật mình
B. đáng thất vọng
C. mơ hồ, không rõ ràng
D. luân phiên
Astounding (adj): đáng kinh ngạc ≈ startling (adj): giật mình

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix. The difference was that only 2,000 cars a day ran down Octavia Street (LIGHT street, in Appleyard’s terminology) while Gough Street (MEDIUM street) was used by 8,000 cars daily, and Franklin Street (HEAVY street) had around 16,000 cars a day. Franklin Street often had as many cars in an hour as Octavia had in a day.
          Heavy traffic brought with it danger, noise, fumes and soot, directly, and trash secondarily. That is, the cars didn’t bring in much trash, but when trash accumulated, residents seldom picked it up. The cars, Appleyard determined, reduced the amount of territory residents felt responsible for. Noise was a constant intrusion into their homes. Many Franklin Street residents covered their doors and windows and spent most of their time in the rear of their houses. Most

families with children had already left.
          Conditions on Octavia Street were much different. Residents picked up trash. They sat on their front steps and chatted with neighbors. They had three times as many friends and twice as many acquaintances as the people on Franklin.
          On Gough Street, residents said that the old feeling of community was disappearing as traffic increased. People were becoming more and more preoccupied with their own lives. A number of families had recently moved and more were considering. Those who were staying expressed deep regret at the destruction of their community.

The three streets mentioned in this passage are different in that __________.

A. they are in different cities.

B. the residents are of different ethnic backgrounds.

C. they have varying amounts of traffic.

D. the income levels of the residents vary considerably.

1
31 tháng 5 2018

Đáp án C

Ba con đường được đề cập khác nhau ở điểm ________
A. Chúng ở khác thành phố.
B. Tôn giáo sắc tộc của dân cư khác nhau.
C. Chúng có lưu lượng giao thông khác nhau.
D. Mức thu nhập của cư dân khác nhau.
Đặc điểm 3 ngôi nhà được đề cập: “looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix”
(trông giống nhau, lượng dân cư độ tuổi trung niên và lao động ngang nhau và có tỉ lệ tôn giáo sắc tộc)
Và sau đó tác giả đưa ra khác biệt chính là: đường Octovia 2,000 xe, Gough 8,000 xe và Franklin 16,000 xe mỗi ngày.

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

           A pioneering study by Donald Appleyard made the astounding discovery that a sudden increase in the volume of traffic through an area affects people in the way that a sudden increase in crime does. Appleyard observed this by finding three blocks of houses in San Francisco that looked much alike and had the same kind of middle-class and working-class residents, with approximately the same ethnic mix. The difference was that only 2,000 cars a day ran down Octavia Street (LIGHT street, in Appleyard’s terminology) while Gough Street (MEDIUM street) was used by 8,000 cars daily, and Franklin Street (HEAVY street) had around 16,000 cars a day. Franklin Street often had as many cars in an hour as Octavia had in a day.
          Heavy traffic brought with it danger, noise, fumes and soot, directly, and trash secondarily. That is, the cars didn’t bring in much trash, but when trash accumulated, residents seldom picked it up. The cars, Appleyard determined, reduced the amount of territory residents felt responsible for. Noise was a constant intrusion into their homes. Many Franklin Street residents covered their doors and windows and spent most of their time in the rear of their houses. Most

families with children had already left.
          Conditions on Octavia Street were much different. Residents picked up trash. They sat on their front steps and chatted with neighbors. They had three times as many friends and twice as many acquaintances as the people on Franklin.
          On Gough Street, residents said that the old feeling of community was disappearing as traffic increased. People were becoming more and more preoccupied with their own lives. A number of families had recently moved and more were considering. Those who were staying expressed deep regret at the destruction of their community.

What is the writer’s attitude toward heavy traffic when he mentions the Appleyard’s study?

A. neutral    

B. favorable 

C. critical    

D. doubtful

1
22 tháng 5 2019

Đáp án C

Thái độ của tác giả đối với giao thông đông đúc ra sao khi ông đề cập nghiên cứu của Appleyard?
A. trung lập
B. ủng hộ
C. chỉ trích
D. nghi ngờ
Nhắc đến heavy traffic, tác giả nói đến mối nguy hại của nó và những hệ luỵ kéo theo. Từ đó có thể thấy được sự phản đối, chỉ trích của tác giả đối với nó.