Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
It is common that the highest management of businesses is covered by senior and experienced leaders. However, some people believe in the fact, that young generation should take over. I'm partially agree with this statement. This essay will discuss this interesting topic and provide evidence and examples.
Firstly, business' success is depended on its leaders, who manage lower ranked managers, staff and labours. The Leadership is something individuals are born with or can be taught at universities. Many organisations are critically reliant on experienced staff who provides the best model role to others. In particular banks, businesses focused on human resources cannot be supervised by young staff. This named professions require highly qualified, trained and experienced individuals. Th experience is something people learn over the years, as a result of this, young people are not suitable to be in leading position.
From the other hand, many companies such as Apple, Google, Facebook etc. are seeking young experts with fresh and innovative ideas to boost their profit. Notwithstanding, senior and experienced managers are essential in matter of financial control, their ideas might be out of date. Young generation accommodated easily to new technology and software than their elder society, based on this fact, their performance in leadership will be highly appreciated. The named global companies are the clear example of business empowered by unexperienced, however, graduated individuals.
To sum up, so called older people in managers position might benefit any business, nevertheless, young leaders should be more innovative and experienced from their lifestyle.
bạn nên lập luận ra thì bài sẽ đầy đủ và nghe thuyết phục hơn!
Some people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside; other people think that it’s better their children to grow up in a big city. Both possibilities have some advantages and disadvantages. I’ll give advantages of each approach and I’ll argue in favor of this that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside.
In a society where money, career and convenience are important things, many people prefer to live in big cities. Consequently their children grow up there. In the following passage I’ll state some important aspects of the life in the big cities. People go to live there at many reasons. First, a big city provides many opportunities for career and education. For instance, If I live in South Dakota I’ll have chance to live in connection with nature but there are few universities and work positions. However if I live in New York I’ll have opportunity to choose between hundreds of universities and thousands free work positions. This connection If our children grow up in a big city, they will have chance to study in prestige school. Besides, they will be prepared for the life with strong competition.
However we know that the life in a big city has some disadvantages. For instance, stress is problem number one in a big city. That is why many people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside. The life there has many advantages. First, children, which grow up in the countryside, have chance to live with connection with nature. In most cases there are more calmly and they seldom suffer from psychical diseases in contrast with children which grow in a big city. The life in the countryside is not so dynamic than life in the big city. In the countryside there are few changes. For example, children often spend their childhood in one house, they study in one school, and their parents rarely change their work positions, which reflect negative on the children. To sum up, the life in the countryside is related to few problems than this in a big city.
In conclusion, I think that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside. That is why, the first thing that we must save is health of our children.
Studying English language in an English - speaking country has many advantages. Howver, I believe that it is not the best way to learn the language.
Firstly, most students who live in non - English - speaking countries learn English at secondary schooland at university.Although their spoken is not fluent, their knowledge of grammar is often quite advanced. This is useful when they come to an English - speaking country to improve the language.
Secondly, students'living at home do not have to worry about problems such as: finding accommodation, paying for their study, living costs and trying to survive in a foreign country. It would cause them much stress.
Finally, nowadays, the society is grower and grower and information technology is also improved. The internet thus also born. So we can register a few courses on the network. It also helps us to speak and communicate with English speakers.
For the reasons above, I believe that we can learn English whenever and wherever nowadays.
e ko bt gửi ảnh nên e dịch nha :
Người ta nói rằng dành nhiều thời gian cho việc sử dụng điện thoại thông minh và xem tivi là không tốt cho trẻ em. Bạn đồng ý hay không đồng ý với ý kiến sau?
a copy ik nha
For centuries, deforestation, farming, urbanisation and other human activities have wreaked havoc with wild animal species and sent them to the verge of extinction. Regarding wildlife protection, awareness has been raised and attempts have been made. However, some hold the idea that the protection of endangered species has been given inordinate amount of attention and resources. Personally, I do not see eye to eye with this point of view.In the first place, wildlife protection has never taken centre stage on the media.Compared with celebrities, for example, the amount of coverage of wild animals isinfinitesimal. Clearly, the reason is profits. In other words, programs featuring wildanimals do not generate interest of the public and accordingly returns for theproducers. The absence of educational programs concerning the lives of wild animalshas blinded people to the reality that wild animals are dying and the ecological systemare being disrupted severely. In addition, governments around the world do not prioritise wildlife conservation in their agenda’s. As a matter of fact, laws to save wild animals have been introduced, but they are loosely enforced. Because of this, every man can freely exploit land, chop down forests, and divert the water sources, all of which combine to destroy the natural habitats of threatened animals. In every corners of the world, with or without intention, human are still causing changes in climatic and geopgraphical conditions, which accelerates of animal extinction. In light of this fact, I feel that not enough attention and resources are being given in the conservation of wild flora and fauna and stronger actions need to be taken to save them.
Music is a great way to bring people of different cultures and ages together” -I totally agree with this point. I think EDM (Electronic Dance Music) is the best music that I've heard. people create. Music plays an important role in our modern world. It can eliminate cultural and generational differences. Music has the ability to broaden people's horizons and welcome different cultures from all over the world. Needless to say, each country has its own traditions to enforce their culture and norms. Music can bridge this cultural gap and is a great way to help individuals collaborate better with others. For example, music parties like Tomorrowland are held all over the world, giving citizens from all over the world the opportunity to get in touch with the national culture and gain a deeper understanding of it. Overall, we cannot deny the importance of music in our lives and its ability to connect people from different cultural backgrounds and ages.
