Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Modern era triggered people to create new architecture such as flats and houses. Moreover, most people want building with long lasting whereas others want building quickly and cheaply. I am personally convinced that both of them have some reasons.
To begin with, many architects made amazing design of buildings. Moreover, high technology of modern building forces an architect to improve their design become unique and outstanding. For example, modern people prefer to have their own architect to design their house as a place that they imagine. Certainly, it is need more detail design to build fabulous houses. Next, as we can see the beautiful house from Anang, famous singer in Indonesia, that his house became different with detail ornament likely palace of Arab States. Obviously, people need more money and more time to dream their dream houses becomes true.
Nevertheless, some people prefer an instant flat which are cheaper and quicker than the first house. Perhaps, the important things for them are comfort houses with limited budget. Thus, people will buy house in apartment or home rent area which are available and affordable to reach as quick as they can. In other ways, they do not pay much money because some regency gives them easier of payment by taking monthly payment approximately 100 until 500 USD on each flat. After all, people could add some ornaments in their house from timber or metal. Others they could put the pictures of modern galleries to make their home more fashionable.
From my point of views, people could design their new houses by taking own architect to make a great outstanding houses. Of course, people take much money for creating new design for their lovely houses. Whereas, some people prefer to other flats which are available and affordable. According to Indonesian Minister of Finance, Indonesia people spent fifty percent from their salary for appropriate accommodation such as house and vehicles. Others there are people with less salary who need better flats for living. By that, I think government should help to provide cheaper flats for their citizen with less money. The government could make regulation for create a cheaper flat from them.
To sum up, I agree to both of them that having great outstanding houses are like dreaming for some people who keep much money. Whereas, I think it is better to accommodate other people with minimum salary to live in an affordable flats or apartment by some regulations from government.
Housing is one of basic needs which have to fulfill by people for protecting them from hot, cold, storm, rain and so on. So many dwellings are designed as perfect as possible and spend long time. On the other hand, accommodations are constructed fastly and need no much money. Usually the users of both choices are different depend on their wealth.
In my country, house is used by the owner to show prestige and causing many people makes their place to live as their dreams. They choose quality materials, the best circumstance to place their house or employ an architect. The owner hopes the house can last for long time through her or his children. The occupant also can feel comfort in there, while the type of that house needs long time and much money.
In contrary, the simple house which needs quick and cheap prize are also needed by some people. For instance the collegian, I am a university student who prefer inexpensive prize flat. In addition, if a disaster happens, the government must give the victims place to stay or live. In 2008, when Tsunami broke Nangroe Aceh Darusalam province, my president commanded social ministry and general disaster tackling organization to construct complexes in the short term. The buildings had no good quality material because the committees had no long time to prepare all properly. They only though, how the Aceh citizens could be still alive.
In conclusion, I think that both type of flats or houses are important to be considered as the usage. While the fas accommodations ahould be built by government or private with declining risk management.
It is certainly true that people in rural areas move to cities in order to achieve high standards of living, but indeed life in cities is more challenging and difficult when compared to villages. There are several reasons for this kind of problem and various measures could be taken by government to improve the situation.
Life in the cities has its drawbacks, for instance, the cost of living in cities is higher than in rural areas, especially housing is much more expensive. As a result, homelessness is becoming more common in cities. There are also more serious problem like traffic congestion and some people do not manage work that can lead to people to commit crime. Moreover, there is a lack of sense of community in big cities, people do not even know their neighbors. Life in cities can be stressful and individuals do not have much time for themselves and their families, as a result the gap between family members is on the increase.
To overcome the increasing troublesome life in cities, the government should start some active measures. Firstly, one key to cities work better is good planning. Planners need to transform cities to make them beneficial for all citizens. Cities need green transport and green spaces; they need to be energy efficient and pedestrian friendly, with housing and jobs to attract people to come to live there. Secondly, the authority should make stricter laws to reduce traffic such as allowing ownership of only car per family and increasing the price of the car and petrol. And people would be encouraged to use public transport rather than driving. Finally, the initiatives could solve the housing problem by building high-rise apartment or by expanding cities.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there are various reasons for the problem in cities life that we are facing now and steps need to taken to tackle this problem.
Cities are often seen as places of opportunity, but there are also some major drawbacks of living in a large metropolis. In my opinion, governments could do much more to improve city life for the average inhabitant.
The main problem for anyone who hopes to migrate to a large city is that the cost of living is likely to be much higher than it is in a small town or village. Inhabitants of cities have to pay higher prices for housing, transport, and even food. Another issue is that urban areas tend to suffer from social problems such as high crime and poverty rates in comparison with rural areas. Furthermore, the air quality in cities is often poor, due to pollution from traffic, and the streets and public transport systems are usually overcrowded. As a result, city life can be unhealthy and stressful.
However, there are various steps that governments could take to tackle these problems. Firstly, they could invest money in the building of affordable or social housing to reduce the cost of living. Secondly, politicians have the power to ban vehicles from city centres and promote the use of cleaner public transport, which would help to reduce both air pollution and traffic congestion. In London, for example, the introduction of a congestion charge for drivers has helped to curb the traffic problem. A third option would be to develop provincial towns and rural areas, by moving industry and jobs to those regions, in order to reduce the pressure on major cities.
In conclusion, governments could certainly implement a range of measures to enhance the quality of life for all city residents.
In the current world, most of the people to celebrate any special occasion by inviting a lot of people. The discussion that throwing too much money to hold parties birthday, marriage or any other special event is a debatable one, with strong logics provided by the supporters of both the views.
A few argue that the special events need to be celebrated grandly, as it happens only a few times in a lifetime. For instance, marriage is considered to occur once in a lifetime and the people want to have the memory of that event until their last breath. This is possible only when the location is well decorated and all of the friends and the neighbours are invited. By spending limited money, it is almost impossible to achieve something special which will be remembered forever. Thus it is obvious, why some people incline towards this point of view.
On the other hand, some people believe that it is not right to spend a huge amount money on personal celebrations as there are a lot of people across the globe under starvation. For example, in most of the African countries, many people do not even have food to eat for a single meal a day. In case, the money spent on celebration can be sent to the people who are really in need, definitely, a lot of life can be saved. Hence, it is clear why a few individuals refute with high spending parties.
Considering the memories of special occasions as well as starvation, spending much money for parties has been supported and refuted by many. Even though memories of some special events are important, saving human life from starvation is more important. Hence, in my opinion, it is necessary to cut down the spending on parties and spend that money for the poor people’s food.
Đáp án: A
Giải thích: Dựa vào câu: “There are 24 tables for students and one desk for the teacher”.
Dịch: Có 24 cái bàn cho học sinh và 1 bàn cho giáo viên.
Fairy tales are very good for children beacuse of some reasons. Firstly, they boost a child's imagination and cultural literacy. A child's imagation is a powerful and unique thing. It's not only used to make up stories and games, it;s a key factor in their creative thoughts and can define the type of education, career and life they have. Fairy tales often include difference cultures and ways of doing things. They teach children about cultural difference in the world outside. Then, they gift children a curiosity to learn new things and experience new places.
Secondly, fairy tales teach children right from wrong. It;s always in a fairytales's DNA to have a strong moral lesson, a fight between good and evil, love and loss, and these lessons rub off on our children. Fairy tales teach children that good persons will always win and, while this may not be true in aspects of the of the real world, the lesson is simple and important. Be the hero, not the villain, Learn to hope for better.
1. How many main advantages of fairy tales are mentioned in the passage?
2
2. What does the writer say about children's imagination?
A child's imagation is a powerful and unique thing.
3. According to the writer, what do fairy tales often include?
Fairy tales often include difference cultures and ways of doing things
4. What do fairy tales tech children?
Fairy tales teach children that good persons will always win and They teach children about cultural difference in the world outside.
5. What does a fairy tale aways have?
a strong moral lesson
Fairy tales are very good for children beacuse of some reasons. Firstly, they boost a child's imagination and cultural literacy. A child's imagation is a powerful and unique thing. It's not only used to make up stories and games, it;s a key factor in their creative thoughts and can define the type of education, career and life they have. Fairy tales often include difference cultures and ways of doing things. They teach children about cultural difference in the world outside. Then, they gift children a curiosity to learn new things and experience new places.
Secondly, fairy tales teach children right from wrong. It;s always in a fairytales's DNA to have a strong moral lesson, a fight between good and evil, love and loss, and these lessons rub off on our children. Fairy tales teach children that good persons will always win and, while this may not be true in aspects of the of the real world, the lesson is simple and important. Be the hero, not the villain, Learn to hope for better.
1. How many main advantages of fairy tales are mentioned in the passage?
=> There are twom main advantages of fairy tales are mentioned in the passage
2. What does the writer say about children's imagination?
=> The writer say about a powerful and unique thing
3. According to the writer, what do fairy tales often include?
=> Fairy tales often include difference cultures and ways of doing things.
4. What do fairy tales tech children?
=> They teach children about cultural difference in the world outside. Then, they gift children a curiosity to learn new things and experience new places.
5. What does a fairy tale aways have?
=> A fairy tale always have a strong moral lesson, a fight between good and evil, love and loss, and these lessons rub off on our children.
Đáp án: A
Giải thích: Dựa vào câu: “He often stays late to prepare for tomorrow’s lessons.”
Dịch: Anh ấy thường ở lại muộn để chuẩn bị cho tiết học ngày mai.
Fame seems to appeal to everyone due to its attraction and glamour. Many prefer to be a famous one or a celebrity to change their life. However, everything has its both side. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of fame.
To begin with, they get a special treatment everywhere they go. Celebrities get special tables at restaurants, best sit at theatres and VIP treatment at clubs or events. They get free parking at hotels or they cars are guarded at events.
On the other hand, celebrities have no private, that make they are constantly judged. They are judged for the clothes they wear, their bodies, make-up, personalities and cars that they drive. Newspapers, magazines, blogs and social networks you can always find the rude, nasty, insulting, and derogatory and lies about celebrity’s daily routine. It’s like we forget that they’re human beings.
Fame carries also worry about your own safety and the safety of your family. There is always a danger that a crazy fan may try to kidnap or kill you or your children, so it is necessary to employ bodyguards.
All in all, fame may be nice but not an easy thing to live with. You have money but you do not feel safe, you have friends and fans but you can never be sure if they like you for who you are or for your money.
Mọi người sửa giúp em bài này ạ! Em cảm ơn mọi người nhiều <3
Write an essay between 100-150 words: What are the advantages and disadvantages of being famous?
Fame seems to appeal to everyone due to its attraction and glamour. Many prefer to be a famous one or a celebrity to change their life. However, everything has its both side -> two sides : pros and cons. ( Bn muốn nhấn mạnh ở pros and cons thì nên nói rõ 2 mặt chứ both: cả, nó ko có nghĩa là 2 mặt ). This essay will discuss the pros and cons of fame.-> Câu này phải bỏ vì đây là văn viết chứ ko phải văn nói.
To begin with, they get a special treatment everywhere they go. Bổ sung thêm trong câu này luôn nha : They can also get good medical care ỏ excellent entertainment. For example, we can treated by well-qualified doctors n high qualify hospitals. Celebrities get special tables at restaurants, best sit at theatres-> theaters and VIP treatment at clubs or events. They get free parking at hotels or they cars are guarded at events. -> Ko đc hợp lí nên bỏ bớt đi.
* Thức ra đã nói đến advantages và disavantages của being famous thì bn phải liệt kê đủ tức là bn nói 3 pros thì cx khoảng 3-4 cons chứ ko đc 1 pros mà 3-4 cons đc.Nếu như thế nó gọi là kết cấu chưa phù hợp.
-----> Trâm sẽ liệt kê một số pros nữa nha:
* Nevertheless, The most obvious advantages of being famous is the fact that it's very easy to earn money so they can purchase things. They can enjoy their life and have a good conditions like a large house with garden, big living room, large and big bedroom,.. with a lot of ne modern technologies..... etc.
* Moreover, it's interesting to appear on TV or magazines and be admitted by lots of people.
------ Chú ý sử dụng đa dạng từ và từ nối.
On the other hand, celebrities have no private-> private life -> như thế mói biểu thị rõ ý nghĩa, that make they are constantly-> frequently judged. They are judged for the clothes they wear, their bodies, make-up, personalities and cars that they drive. In Newspapers, magazines, blogs and social networks, you can always find the rude, nasty, insulting, and derogatory and-> or lies about celebrity’s daily routine. It’s like we forget that they’re human beings.-> nên bỏ đi.
Fame carries-> The famous also worry about your->their own safety and the safety of your-> their family. There is always a danger that a crazy fans or anti-fans may try to kidnap or kill you or your children, so it is necessary to employ bodyguards.
All in all, fame may be nice but not an easy thing to live with. You have money but you do not feel safe, you have friends and fans but you can never be sure if they like you for who you are or for your money.
* Kết bài khá độc đáo tuy nhiên ở ngay sau câu đầu tiên bn có thể nói lên suy nghĩ của mình ví dụ như : I'm in favor of having a normal life than being famous. As you have money.....
-----------> Trên đây là suy nghĩ là góp ý của Trân về bài viết của bn.
Visiting to various places such as museums, zoos, theatre and even foreign countries for children at secondary school are more and more popular. While I believe that there are some negative impacts on children, visiting should be utilized in school for many positive outcomes.
The main benefit for children when they are attended outdoor activities is that they are learnt in the real world. This means children not only learn on their class with many paper theories, but they also learn lessons through experience reality. For example, they can learn geography by watch discoveries programme on television, or they can see real history by go to visit museums. All these can inspire them to learn well.
Another positive point for children who are taken on visit to many places while learning at secondary school is that it makes them more confidence. If they learn through playing, they will not have any pressure because they do not have to memorize as robot. For instance, once my daughter asked me: “what is war” and I had taught her by opened a clip told about the war in Viet Nam. As a result, she understood immediately.
Admittedly, to some people such visits have some disadvantages. First of all, it takes time away from real learning if children visit too many places. In addition, children who are the poor will not enough finance to efford all trips which school organizes, this makes them feel embarrassed.
In conclusion, while outdoor activities can have some negative effects on children at secondary school, it seems to me that secondary school should organize more visiting in order to give children the best.