Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Bạn tham khảo nhé !!
Parents can be the best teacher for every child coming on this earth. I agree with this statement as no learning institution can be compared with the parents as they are role models for their children since they open their eyes in this world till they are fully grown up and matured.
To start with when the child is born he sees his parents as his guide, mentor & teacher who will teach him how to speak, eat, drink, live, wear, interact etc. No one will be with him when he is crying for anything it will be the parents who will be with him for every problem and his / her every need. Even during his education days he will observe and learn that the school although is the learning institution but the moral & ethical values learned from parents are far greater than any learning center and parents will be the one who wants the children to be the best in this world and they want their children not to repeat the mistakes that they have done in their lives which any learning institution won’t care for as they can’t give individual attention to every student.
On the other hand, we see that generally the children who are orphans or could not get the attention from their parents don’t have that foundation of ethical, moral and social values as compared to the ones who have been trained by their parents despite all of them have gone to schools, colleges etc. The only difference between them is parents.
If the parents are not well educated they could still prove to be good teachers for their children but that will be of less fruitful from the highly educated parents as educated and learned parents will have more vision and more horizon as compared to the unlearned.
I would like to conclude with the statement that parents can be a turning point for his child if he tries to teach every step of living this life.
I do not agree on computer learning. Although learning on computers, although helping learners to be more flexible in the fields of technology and creativity, there are still many negative aspects, not meeting the learning needs of students:
First, the quality of learning via the Internet cannot be compared with the traditional way of learning - which creates better interaction between students and teachers, managed, questioned, evaluated.
Second, online training can cause social isolation, because school is not only a place to learn but also a place where they come to socialize, make new friends and learn more communication experiences.
Third, this form creates an unevenness among localities. For children who have full learning equipment, have a sense of self-study and good family management, it works. Those children with difficult and unmanaged conditions will learn to cope.
While the benefits of learning online are obvious, it's important to remember that not all courses can be taught online. Therefore, online training should be seen as a complementary and extensible approach to classical forms of learning.
I half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the school, the student can learn all the subject to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and specially, they can play with their friends. But sometime, study too much make they feel stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantage. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptation like: games, cartoons... make they can't forcus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use to much or to long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
With many reasons, the Internet just help 40 percents the children on study. I think schools have many advantage than study on Internet
Some people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside; other people think that it’s better their children to grow up in a big city. Both possibilities have some advantages and disadvantages. I’ll give advantages of each approach and I’ll argue in favor of this that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside.
In a society where money, career and convenience are important things, many people prefer to live in big cities. Consequently their children grow up there. In the following passage I’ll state some important aspects of the life in the big cities. People go to live there at many reasons. First, a big city provides many opportunities for career and education. For instance, If I live in South Dakota I’ll have chance to live in connection with nature but there are few universities and work positions. However if I live in New York I’ll have opportunity to choose between hundreds of universities and thousands free work positions. This connection If our children grow up in a big city, they will have chance to study in prestige school. Besides, they will be prepared for the life with strong competition.
However we know that the life in a big city has some disadvantages. For instance, stress is problem number one in a big city. That is why many people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside. The life there has many advantages. First, children, which grow up in the countryside, have chance to live with connection with nature. In most cases there are more calmly and they seldom suffer from psychical diseases in contrast with children which grow in a big city. The life in the countryside is not so dynamic than life in the big city. In the countryside there are few changes. For example, children often spend their childhood in one house, they study in one school, and their parents rarely change their work positions, which reflect negative on the children. To sum up, the life in the countryside is related to few problems than this in a big city.
In conclusion, I think that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside. That is why, the first thing that we must save is health of our children.
