Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Read the following passage and decide if it is T or F
Many people still believe that natural resources will never be used up. Actually, the world's energy resources are limited. Nobody knows exactly how much fuel is left. However, we also should use them economically and try to find out allternative sources of power. According to Professor Marvin Burnharrm of the New England Institude of Technology, we have to start conserving coal. oil and gas before it is too late; and nuclear power is the only alternative.
However, many people do not approve of using nuclear power because it's very dangerous.What would happen if there was a serious nuclear accident? Radioactivity causes cancer and may badly affect the future generations.
The most effective thing ia that we should use natural resources as economical as possible.
| Statements | T/F |
|
1.Natural resources will run out 2.The world's energy resources are unlimited 3.We know exactly how muck fuel is left 4.We should use fuel economically 5.According to Professor Marvin Bunrnham, nuclear power will be used as a substitute for natural resources 6.Many people disagree to use nuclear as an alternative energy 7.Radioactivity from nuclear power causes vancer and and may have bad effect on the future generations 8.Natural resources should be used as economical as possinle |
1-T 2-F 3-F 4-T 5-T 6-T 7-F 8-T |
Read the following passage and decide if it is T or F
Many people still believe that natural resources will never be used up. Actually, the world's energy resources are limited. Nobody knows exactly how much fuel is left. However, we also should use them economically and try to find out allternative sources of power. According to Professor Marvin Burnharrm of the New England Institude of Technology, we have to start conserving coal. oil and gas before it is too late; and nuclear power is the only alternative.
However, many people do not approve of using nuclear power because it's very dangerous.What would happen if there was a serious nuclear accident? Radioactivity causes cancer and may badly affect the future generations.
The most effective thing ia that we should use natural resources as economical as possible.
| Statements | T/F |
|
1.Natural resources will run out 2.The world's energy resources are unlimited 3.We know exactly how muck fuel is left 4.We should use fuel economically 5.According to Professor Marvin Bunrnham, nuclear power will be used as a substitute for natural resources 6.Many people disagree to use nuclear as an alternative energy 7.Radioactivity from nuclear power causes vancer and and may have bad effect on the future generations 8.Natural resources should be used as economical as possinle |
1..T... 2..F... 3...F.. 4..T... 5..F...
6..T... 7.T.... 8...T.. |
XX. Read the text then circle the best answer.
Many people still believe that natural resources will never be used up.Actually,the worlds energy resources are limited.Nobody knows exactly how much fuel is left. However, we should use them economically and try to find alternative sources of power. According to Professor Marvin Burnham of the New England Institute of Technology, we have to start conserving coal, oil and gas before it is too late; and nuclear power is the only alternative.
However, many people don't approve of using nuclear power because it is very dangerous. What would happen if there were a serious nuclear accident? Radioactivity causes cancer and may badly affect the future generations. The most effective thing is that we should use natural resources as economically as possible.
1. According to the passage, using nuclear power is...............
A. dangerous B. interesting C. safe D. cheap
2. Radioactivity from nuclear power.................
A. is harmless
B. alters a new kind of energy
C. is necessary to cure diseases
D. causes cances and may badly affect the future generations
3. How much fuel is left?
A. No one knows exactly B. Let' s use it as much as we would like
C. There is a lot of fuel D. It will never be used up
4. We should use coal, oil and gas...............
A. carelessly B. as economically as possible
C. as much as possible D. all are incorrect
In the modern world, people depend on energy to power their everyday lives. A wide range of power-run devices and modern conveniences (1) are taken for granted, and although it may seem that we will not be in danger of living without those conveniences, the fact is that many supplies of energy are running out rapidly. Scientists are constantly (2) searching for new sources of energy to keep modern society running. Whether future populations will continue to enjoy the benefits of abundant energy will depend (3) on the success of this search. Coal, oil and natural gas are now being used widely. (4) However, not only are supplies of , these supplies are limited, and they are a major source of pollution. Therefore, the existing alternative energy sources must be improved or futher explored and developed. These include nuclear, water, solar, and wind power, as well as energy from new, (5) nonpolluting types of fuels types of fuels. Each of these, however, has advantages and disadvantages.
Read the following passage and decide if it is T or F
Many people still believe that natural resources will never be used up. Actually, the world's energy resources are limited. Nobody knows exactly how much fuel is left. However, we also should use them economically and try to find out allternative sources of power. According to Professor Marvin Burnharrm of the New England Institude of Technology, we have to start conserving coal. oil and gas before it is too late; and nuclear power is the only alternative.
However, many people do not approve of using nuclear power because it's very dangerous.What would happen if there was a serious nuclear accident? Radioactivity causes cancer and may badly affect the future generations.
The most effective thing ia that we should use natural resources as economical as possible.
1. We don't know how much fuel is left ......T.............
2. According to Professor Marvin Burnharrm , solar energy will be used as a subtitute for natural resources ........F.............
3. Radioactivity from nuclearpower causes caner and may have bad effect on the future generations .......T................
4. Natural resources should be used as much as possible ........F............
1. Can natural resources be used up someday?
=> Yes, they can.
2. What should we do if we don’t want the natural resources to run out of?
=> We should use them economically and try to find out alternative sources of power
3. Why don’t people prefer using nuclear power?
=> Because it is very dangerous.
4. What does the radioactivity cause for young people?
=> It causes cancer and may badly affect the future generations.
5. What will you do to protect your environment?
=> I will use natural resources as economically as possible.
1. Natural resources can be used up some day
2. Try to find out alternative sources of power, use the natural resources as economically as possible, start conserving coal, oil and gas is what we should do if we don't want the natural resources to tun out of
3. Because it is very dangerous
4. Radioactivity cause cancer and may badly affect young people
5. I'll reuse old things, conserve water, plant trees and bike more to protect my environment
1.How many types of energy sources are mentioned in the text? What are they?
Two. They are renewable and non-renewable.
2.What are the disadvantages of hydro and nuclear power?
Hydro power is limited because dams cannot be built in certain areas. Nuclear power is dangerous.
3.Why do you think the wind and the sun are called alternative sources of energy?
Because they are natural sources of power and we use them instead of non-renewable sources to get the electricity we need.
4.What types of energy does Viet Nam use most?
We use non-renewable sources of energy the most but we are increasingly using hydro power.
5.What does the professor think Viet Nam will use more in the future?
He thinks Viet Nam will use the wind and the sun as alternative sources of energy in the future
1. _T__ Many people in Calcutta live in bad conditions because they have no jobs.
2. _T__ Babies from poor families are taken care of by the local government.
3. _F__ Seventy percent of the families in Calcutta have to live in the streets.
4. _F__ The local government makes effects to help poor families but it cannot solve the problem
successfully.
5 .__T_ Many people in Calcutta live in good conditions because they have no jobs.
6. _F_ Babies are born in the street.
7. __F_ Many people are sick because they don’t have enough money to live.
As America’s nuclear power industry continues to suffer major economic difficulties, some are questioning whether it can - or should - survive. The latest setback came July 31, when state power companies in South Carolina halted construction of two reactors. After spending about $9 billion, the companies decided that increasing costs and repeated building delays did not make the project worth finishing.
U.S. energy company Westinghouse Electric had been building the nuclear plant, which it started in 2012. In March, Westinghouse filed for bankruptcy, due in part to huge losses related to the South Carolina project, as well as others. Industry groups had hoped the South Carolina reactors would mark a new beginning for U.S. nuclear power and show the benefits of the latest technology. The United States remains the world’s top producer of nuclear power, according to the British-based World Nuclear Association. The country’s 100 reactors provide nearly 20 percent of total U.S. electrical output.
However, only two new nuclear reactors are currently being built in the United States – both of them in Georgia. The reactors were the first large nuclear plants to be started in the United States in more than 30 years. And the future of those reactors is uncertain. The project - currently about half-finished - has also suffered major cost overruns and delays. For now, the company’s parent, Japan-based Toshiba, has promised to provide at least $3.7 billion to finish the project.
Translate into Vietnamese:
Tương lai của ngành công nghiệp năng lượng hạt nhân Hoa Kỳ là gì?
Ngành công nghiệp năng lượng hạt nhân của Mỹ tiếp tục bị chính những khó khăn kinh tế, một số đang đặt câu hỏi cho dù nó có thể - hoặc nên - sống sót. Trở ngại mới nhất đến ngày 31 tháng 7, khi công ty quyền lực nhà nước ở South Carolina dừng xây dựng hai lò phản ứng. Sau khi chi tiêu khoảng 9 tỷ USD, các công ty đã quyết định rằng chi phí gia tăng và sự chậm trễ lặp đi lặp lại xây dựng đã không thực hiện các dự án có giá trị khi kết thúc.
Mỹ năng lượng công ty điện Westinghouse đã xây dựng các nhà máy hạt nhân, nó bắt đầu vào năm 2012. Trong tháng ba, Westinghouse nộp cho phá sản, do một phần to lớn thiệt hại liên quan đến dự án Nam Carolina, cũng như những người khác. Nhóm ngành công nghiệp đã hy vọng các lò phản ứng South Carolina sẽ đánh dấu một sự khởi đầu mới cho năng lượng hạt nhân Hoa Kỳ và hiển thị các lợi ích của công nghệ mới nhất. Hoa Kỳ vẫn là nhà sản xuất hàng đầu thế giới của điện hạt nhân, theo Anh dựa trên Hiệp thế giới hạt nhân. Lò phản ứng 100 quốc gia cung cấp gần 20 phần trăm tổng sản lượng điện Hoa Kỳ.
Tuy nhiên, chỉ có hai lò phản ứng hạt nhân mới hiện đang được xây dựng tại Hoa Kỳ-cả hai người trong số họ ở Georgia. Các lò phản ứng đã là các nhà máy hạt nhân lớn đầu tiên được bắt đầu tại Hoa Kỳ trong hơn 30 năm. Và tương lai của các lò phản ứng là không chắc chắn. Các dự án hiện nay, khoảng một nửa đã hoàn thành - cũng đã bị chính chi phí nghiêm và sự chậm trễ. Bây giờ, cha mẹ của công ty, dựa trên Nhật bản Toshiba, đã hứa sẽ cung cấp cho tối thiểu là 3,7 tỷ USD để hoàn thành dự án.
( Don't use Google Translate.)