K
Khách

Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.

9 tháng 1 2018

Đáp án A

Giải thích: Trong câu so sánh hơn, hai đối tượng phải được để ở cùng dạng, ở vế trước đã dùng “total weight of” thì vế sau ta cần dùng “that of”.

Dịch: Tổng cân nặng của kiến trên thế giới thì nhiều hơn rất nhiều cân nặng của con người.

5 tháng 8 2017

Đáp án: C

Giải thích: cụm từ: “for the benefit of”: vì lợi ích của

Dịch:Khoa học được sử dụng trong mọi ngóc ngách của thế giới vì lợi ích của con người.

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.Endangered species          There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

Endangered species

          There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

          Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

          Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

The author mentioned all of the following as justifications for the protection of endangered species EXCEPT _______. 

A. the natural compounds needed for medicines

B. the intrinsic value of the beauty of nature

C. the control of pollution in the biosphere 

D. the right to life implied by their existence

1
17 tháng 9 2019

Đáp án C.

Keywords: justification, protection, endangered species, EXCEPT.

Clue:

     1. “important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure” (lý luận của trường phái sinh thái học).

     2. many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty” (lý luận thẩm mĩ học).

     3. all species have the right to exist” (lý luận về đạo đức).

Phân tích:

A. The natural compounds needed for medicines: Các hợp chất tự nhiên cần thiết cho thuốc. (xem clue 1)

B. The intrinsic value of the beauty of nature: Giá trị thực chất của vẻ đẹp của tự nhiên. (xem clue 2)

C. The control of pollution in the biosphere: Kiểm soát ô nhiễm trong sinh quyển. (không có thông tin trong bài)

D. The right to life implied by their existence: Quyền sống được ngụ ý bởi sự tồn tại của chúng. (xem clue 3)

Ngoài đáp án C ra các đáp án khác đều được nêu trong bài đọc để lập luận cho việc bảo vệ các loài sinh vật đang bị đe doạ.

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. ENDANGERED SPECIES There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations  World Charter for nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

The author mentions all of the following as justifications for the protection of endangered species EXCEPT ___________.

A. the natural compounds needed for medicines

B. the intrinsic value of the beauty of nature 

C. the control of pollution in the biosphere 

D. the right to life implied by their existence

1
6 tháng 4 2017

Chọn C.

Đáp án C.

Dịch câu hỏi: Tác giả đề cập đến tất cả những điều sau đây như là biện minh cho việc bảo vệ các loài nguy cấp tuyệt chủng NGOẠI TRỪ _________

A. có thể tìm thấy ở đoạn 2.

B. có thể thấy ở dòng 2-3

D. có thể thấy ở dòng 17 “the right to exist”.

Riêng đáp án C “sự kiểm soát ô nhiễm” là điều không được nhắc tới trong toàn bài.

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. Endangered species  There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

Endangered species

 There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called "deep ecology," the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

The author mentioned all of the following as justifications for the protection of endangered species EXCEPT_______.

A. the natural compounds needed for medicines

B. the intrinsic value of the beauty of nature

C. the control of pollution in the biosphere

D. the right to life implied by their existence

1
20 tháng 7 2019

Đáp án C.

Keywords: justifications, protection, endangered species, EXCEPT.

Clue:

1. “important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure” (lý luận ca trường phái sinh thái học).

2. many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty” (lý luận thm mĩ học).

3. all species have the right to exist” (lý luận về đạo đức).

Phân tích:

A. The natural compounds needed for medicines: Các hợp cht tự nhiên cn thiết cho thuốc. (xem clue 1)

B. The intrinsic value of the beauty of nature: Giá trị thực chất của vẻ đẹp của tự nhiên. (xem clue 2)

C. The control of pollution in the biosphere: Kim soát ô nhiễm trong sinh quyển. (không có thông tin trong bài)

D. The right to life implied by their existence: Quyền sống được ngụ ý bởi sự tồn tại của chúng. (xem clue 3)

Ngoài đáp án C ra các đáp án khác đều được nêu trong bài đọc để lập luận cho việc bảo vệ các loài sinh vật đang bị đe dọa.

Kiến thức cần nhớ

intrinsic (adj) /intrinsik/: bản chất, thực chất

>< extrinsic (adj): nằm ở ngoài, ngoại lai

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.Endangered species          There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

Endangered species

          There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

          Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

          Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

Which of the following is the main topic of the passage?

A. The beauty of the world

B. The quality of life

C. The preservation of species

D. The balance of nature

1
8 tháng 12 2019

Đáp án C.

Keywords: main topic of the passage.

Clue: Câu đầu tiên của đoạn văn: “There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species”: Có 3 vấn đề đang tranh luận để ủng hộ việc bảo tồn các loài động thực vật đang gặp nguy hiểm. Vậy đáp án chính xác là C. The preservation of species: Việc bảo tồn các loài.

Các đáp án còn lại sai:

     A. The beauty of the world: Vẻ đẹp của thế giới

     B. The quality of life: Chất lượng cuộc sống

     C. The balance of nature: Sự cân bằng của thiên nhiên

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. ENDANGERED SPECIES There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations  World Charter for nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

Which of the following is the main topic of the passage?

A. The beauty of the world

B. The quality of life

C. The preservation of species

D. The balance of nature

1
26 tháng 7 2018

Chọn C.

Đáp án C.

Dịch câu hỏi: Điều nào sau đây là chủ đề chính của đoạn văn?

A.  Vẻ đẹp của thế giới          

B. Chất lượng cuộc sống

C. Bảo tồn các loài                 

D. Sự cân bằng của thiên nhiên

Để xác định “main topic” của một đoạn văn, ta phải xác định được mỗi đoan văn nhỏ trong bài nói về cái gì => từ đó suy ra mạch suy luận/logic của toàn bài và ý tác giả muốn hướng tới người đọc.

Ở đây, đoạn 1 tác giả nói có “three arguments“ liên quan tới “preservation of endangered species”. Đoạn 2 là một “another argument", và đoan 3 là ý kiến về một argument khác. Như vậy toàn bài là phân tích 3 argument về preservation of endangered species. => đáp án C là chính xác.

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. Endangered species  There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

Endangered species

 There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called "deep ecology," the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

Which of the following is the main topic of the passage?

A. The beauty of the world

B. The quality of life

C. The preservation of species

D. The balance of nature

1
20 tháng 6 2018

Đáp án C.

Keywords: main topic of the passage.

Clue: Câu đu tiên của đoạn văn: “There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species”: Có 3 vấn đề đang tranh luận để ủng hộ việc bảo tồn các loài động thực vật đang gặp nguy hiểm. Vậy đáp án chính xác là C. The preservation of species: Việc bo tồn các loài.

Các đáp án còn lại sai:

A. The beauty of the world: Vẻ đẹp của thế giới

B. The quality of life: Cht lượng cuộc sống

D. The balance of nature: Sự cân bng của thiên nhiên

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. An aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture, attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self–interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called "deep ecology", the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

(Source: Adapted from Reading Practice for the TOEFL) 

It can be inferred from the passage that the author _________.

A. is a member of the "deep ecology" movement 

B. does not agree with ecological self–interest

C. supports all of the arguments to protect species 

D. participated in drafting the Chapter for Nature

1
9 tháng 1 2018

Chọn C

Kiến thức: Đọc hiểu

Giải thích:

Có thể suy ra từ đoạn văn rằng tác giả _______.

A. là một thành viên của phong trào "sinh thái sâu sắc"

B. không đồng ý với lợi ích sinh thái

C. ủng hộ tất cả các lý lẽ để bảo vệ các loài

D. tham gia soạn thảo Hiến chương về Tự nhiên

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.Endangered species          There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

Endangered species

          There are three valid arguments to support the preservation of endangered species. Aesthetic justification contends that biodiversity contributes to the quality of life because many of the endangered plants and animals are particularly appreciated for their unique physical beauty. The aesthetic role of nature in all its diverse forms is reflected in the art and literature of every culture attaining symbolic status in the spiritual life of many groups. According to the proponents of the aesthetic argument, people need nature in all its diverse and beautiful forms as part of the experience of the world.

          Another argument that has been put forward, especially by groups in the medical and pharmacological fields, is that of ecological self-interest. By preserving all species, we retain a balance of nature that is ultimately beneficial to humankind. Recent research on global ecosystems has been cited as evidence that every species contributes important or even essential functions that may be necessary to the survival of our own species. Some advocates of the ecological argument contend that important chemical compounds derived from rare plants may contain the key to a cure for one of the diseases currently threatening human beings. If we do not protect other species, then they cannot protect us.

          Apart from human advantage in both the aesthetic and ecological arguments, the proponents of a moral justification contend that all species have the right to exist, a viewpoint stated in the United Nations World Charter for Nature, created in 1982. Furthermore, if humankind views itself as the stewards of all the creatures on Earth, then it is incumbent upon human beings to protect them, and to ensure the continued existence of all species. Moral justification has been extended by a movement called “deep ecology,” the members of which rank the biosphere higher than people because the continuation of life depends on this larger perspective. To carry their argument to its logical conclusion, all choices must be made for the biosphere, not for people.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author ______.

A. is a member of the “deep ecology” movement

B. does not agree with ecological self-interest

C. supports all of the arguments to protect species

D. participated in drafting the Charter for Nature

1
7 tháng 4 2017

Đáp án C.

Keywords: inferred, passage, author.

Phân tích: Qua bài đọc ta nhận thấy tác giả liệt kê ra 3 trường phái lý luận, không tỏ ra ủng hộ một lý luận riêng nào hơn tất cả, cũng không có một lời nào phê phán các lý luận ấy, vì vậy có thể suy ra là nhìn chung tác giả ủng hộ tất cả các lý luận đó. Nên đáp án là C. supports all of the arguments to protect species.

Các đáp án còn lại là sai:

     A. is a member of the “deep ecology” movement: là một thành viên của phong trào “sinh thái sâu sắc”.

     B. does not agree with ecological self-interest: không đồng ý với việc tư lợi sinh thái.

     D. participated in drafting the Charter for Nature: tham gia soạn thảo Hiến chương Thiên nhiên.