write a paragraph ( 120-140 words ) on the topic: what benefits does internet bring about to students?
K
Khách
Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Những câu hỏi liên quan
S
6 tháng 6 2021
Refer:
There has been a lot of argument about whether students should be allowed to bring their mobile phones to school. In my opinion, students should not be allowed to bring their mobile phones to school. Let me explain why it is reasonable not to allow students to bring their phones to school.
First of all, I think mobile phones will sidetrack the learning of students. If they use their mobile phones for playing or just for learning purpose, they may not pay enough attention in class because they just concentrate on playing with their mobile phones. So, the academic results of the students will drop due to the use of the mobile phones during the class. Moreover, the learning process of the students may be hindered too.
Secondly, bringing their own mobile phones is not necessary because of the public phones in school. Public phones are provided by the school. So, students can use phones near the school gate or tuck shop. And there are three public phones, which are enough for students to contact their parents. They need not bring their phones to school if their reason is contacting their parents.
What is more, there are enough resources for learning in school already. As a result, students don’t have the need to bring their phones to school. Because of the rapid development of technologies nowadays, computers are invented. So they can use computers for learning. Moreover, computers mostly have the programmes or function which mobile phones share the same too. Therefore,it is not a must or a need for students to bring their phones to school.
However, some students said that the purpose of bringing mobile phones to school is to contact parents if they face a traffic accident. But in fact, students just use one or two minutes to contact their parents, and they use plenty of time to play games in their mobile phones. This shows the main purpose of bringing mobile phones is not contacting their parents, but to play with their mobile phones on the way back home. Bringing mobile phones in order to contact their parents is just an excuse for them.
To sum up, students bringing their phones to school is just to play with their phones only, but not to contact their parents. Therefore, I think students should not be allowed to bring mobile phones to school.
6 tháng 6 2021
Today, there are many students who are using, there are private phones for themselves, but there are some of you who not only use them at home but also bring them to school to use, I partially agree and partly disagree. As for the consent, there are people who need to use the phone as a source of information to look up and study online. but I don't mind more. Because most students bring their phones to school to surf the net, take pictures, text messages, and access unhealthy social networking sites. Therefore, even if the phone can be looked up and useful for learning, it should not be brought to school
N
15 tháng 4 2019
Hal Varian, chief economist at Google, has a simple way to predict the future. The future is simply what rich people have today. The rich have chauffeurs. In the future, we will have driverless cars that chauffeur us all around. The rich have private bankers. In the future, we will all have robo-bankers.
One thing that we imagine that the rich have today are lives of leisure. So will our future be one in which we too have lives of leisure, and the machines are taking the sweat? We will be able to spend our time on more important things than simply feeding and housing ourselves?
Let’s turn to another chief economist. Andy Haldane is chief economist at the Bank of England. In November 2015, he predicted that 15 million jobs in the UK, roughly half of all jobs, were under threat from automation. You’d hope he knew what he was talking about.
AdvertisementAnd he’s not the only one making dire predictions. Politicians. Bankers. Industrialists. They’re all saying a similar thing.
“We need urgently to face the challenge of automation, robotics that could make so much of contemporary work redundant”, Jeremy Corbyn at the Labour Party Conference in September 2017.
“World Bank data has predicted that the proportion of jobs threatened by automation in India is 69 percent, 77 percent in China and as high as 85 percent in Ethiopia”, according to World Bank president Jim Yong Kim in 2016.
It really does sound like we might be facing the end of work as we know it.
Many of these fears can be traced back to a 2013 study from the University of Oxford. This made a much quoted prediction that 47% of jobs in the US were under threat of automation in the next two decades. Other more recent and detailed studies have made similar dramatic predictions.
Now, there’s a lot to criticize in the Oxford study. From a technical perspective, some of report’s predictions are clearly wrong. The report gives a 94% probability that bicycle repair person will be automated in the next two decades. And, as someone trying to build that future, I can reassure any bicycle repair person that there is zero chance that we will automate even small parts of your job anytime soon. The truth of the matter is no one has any real idea of the number of jobs at risk.
Even if we have as many as 47% of jobs automated, this won’t translate into 47% unemployment. One reason is that we might just work a shorter week. That was the case in the Industrial Revolution. Before the Industrial Revolution, many worked 60 hours per week. After the Industrial Revolution, work reduced to around 40 hours per week. The same could happen with the unfolding AI Revolution.
Another reason that 47% automation won’t translate into 47% unemployment is that all technologies create new jobs as well as destroy them. That’s been the case in the past, and we have no reason to suppose that it won’t be the case in the future. There is, however, no fundamental law of economics that requires the same number of jobs to be created as destroyed. In the past, more jobs were created than destroyed but it doesn’t have to be so in the future.
In the Industrial Revolution, machines took over many of the physical tasks we used to do. But we humans were still left with all the cognitive tasks. This time, as machines start to take on many of the cognitive tasks too, there’s the worrying question: what is left for us humans?
Some of my colleagues suggest there will be plenty of new jobs like robot repair person. I am entirely unconvinced by such claims. The thousands of people who used to paint and weld in most of our car factories got replaced by only a couple of robot repair people.
No, the new jobs will have to be doing jobs where either humans excel or where we choose not to have machines. But here’s the contradiction. In fifty to hundred years time, machines will be super-human. So it’s hard to imagine of any job where humans will remain better than the machines. This means the only jobs left will be those where we prefer humans to do them.
The AI Revolution then will be about rediscovering the things that make us human. Technically, machines will have become amazing artists. They will be able to write music to rival Bach, and paintings to match Picasso. But we’ll still prefer works produced by human artists.
These works will speak to the human experience. We will appreciate a human artist who speaks about love because we have this in common. No machine will truly experience love like we do.
As well as the artistic, there will be a re-appreciation of the artisan. Indeed, we see the beginnings of this already in hipster culture. We will appreciate more and more those things made by the human hand. Mass-produced goods made by machine will become cheap. But items made by hand will be rare and increasingly valuable.
Finally as social animals, we will also increasingly appreciate and value social interactions with other humans. So the most important human traits will be our social and emotional intelligence, as well as our artistic and artisan skills. The irony is that our technological future will not be about technology but all about our humanity.
Toby Walsh is Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of New South Wales, in Sydney, Australia. His new book, “Android Dreams: the past, present and future of Artificial Intelligence” was published in the UK by Hurst Publishers in September 2017. It’s available from the Guardian Bookshop. You can read more at his blog, http://thefutureofai.blogspot.com/
Since you’re here…… we have a small favour to ask. More people around the world are reading The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. We’ve now been funded by over one million readers. And unlike many news organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism open to all. We believe that each one of us deserves access to accurate information with integrity at its heart.
The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.
Every contribution we receive from readers like you, big or small, goes directly into funding our journalism. This support enables us to keep working as we do – but we must maintain and build on it for every year to come. Support The Guardian
CT
1
NK
19 tháng 10 2021
I think it’s necessary for secondary students to wear uniforms when they are at school because of the following reasons. Firstly, wearing uniforms encourages students to be proud of being students of their school because they are wearing the uniforms with labels bearing their school’s name. Secondly, wearing uniforms helps students feel equal in many ways, whether they are rich or poor Finally, wearing uniforms is practical. we don’t have to think of what to wear every day. Therefore, Students in secondary schools should wear uniform.
13 tháng 4 2018
In modern world, technology has played an active role in people physical lives; on the other hand, it can not touch our spiritual lives while art can. One of several reasons related to this is that art help us express our soul. Actually science is a combinations of tools, methods and machines which solve our physical problems. Meanwhile art such as colorful drawings, paintings, rock songs, romantic movies gives painters, film writers a ability to express their ideas and feelings. That is why art probably touch our soul. Other reason is a benefit of enjoying artworks to who enjoy art. It for instance listening to music and watching movie helps listeners and viewers feel relax after a hard-working day fulled of stress. While, techonology can not cause it can only solve our particular troubles, save time and cost, not a spiritual troubles. In short, both science and art play a significant role in human life, people are not able to live without one of those.
(Tham khảo đi !)
25 tháng 9 2018
This is the first of three posts that I am writing in an attempt to inspire more discussion around the following question: How do we prepare students to be successful in their futures?
Determining an answer to this question, is a discussion that I believe needs to include students, instructors, parents, businesses and community members. In other words, this is a discussion that needs to include everyone!
In order to tackle this issue from the stance of an educator, I want to take a look at three different questions:
-
What are the skills that our students need to be successful?
-
In order to help students develop these skills, what type of projects and assessments can we engage them in?
-
What are some tools and practices that we can use to implement these skills into the classroom?
The goal of this post is to address the first of these three questions.
The Issue
In the United States alone, there are approximately 55.6 million students attending elementary and secondary schools and 20.5 million students attending colleges and universities. In the majority of schools and classrooms that I have worked with, students are mainly being assessed on lower-level thinking skills such as memorization and recall. The multiple choice, short-answer and matching questions, along with the academic research paper, are still depended on as the main modes of assessment.
This needs to change.
My goal was to discover the most important skills that students need to be successful. After speaking with hundreds of business leaders and reading hundreds of articles, it became clear that it is time for education to change. The same skills continued to be mentioned. There is less demand for obedient workers who can simply show up on time and follow directions. There is an increased demand for self-directed workers who can adapt and learn quickly, think critically, communicate and innovate.
Approximately 65% of our students will be employed in jobs that don’t exist yet. So, how do we prepare them for this? I believe that we do so by helping student develop the skills that they will need to succeed in a future filled with uncertainty.
The Skills
I decided to compile the notes I took while doing my research. My goal was to identify the skills that were brought up the most in an attempt to determine which skills our students will need to be successful in their futures. The following are the 10 skills mentioned the most often:
1. Adaptive Thinking: In the digital age, things are changing at exponential rates. By the time employees learn the newest software or program, a better version is coming about. Future employers will need to continuously adapt to changing conditions as well as be able to learn new things quickly and efficiently. We need our students to learn how to learn.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Learning Agility
2. Communication Skills: There continues to be an emphasis on the ability to communicate. In the digital age, however, we have access to a wide variety of new ways to communicate from video-conferencing to social media. Future employers need to be able to communicate with people within their team, as well as people outside of the team and organization.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Communication Tips Weekly
3. Collaboration Skills: Most classrooms foster a culture of competition and independence rather than one of teamwork and collaboration. Future employers will need to quickly adapt to a culture of collaboration. They will need to collaborate with others within and outside of the organization, often using a number of new technologies.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Teamwork Foundations
4. Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills: There is a decreased emphasis on employers following directions and an increased emphasis on employers thinking critically and solving problems. In a rapidly changing world, employers need employees who can solve problems, provide ideas and help improve the organization.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Critical Thinking
5. Personal Management: This includes the ability for employers to independently plan, organize, create and execute, rather than wait for someone to do this for them.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Leading Yourself
6. Inquiry Skills: The large majority of academic assessments ask students for answers. Rarely do we assess students on how well they can ask questions. The ability to ask great questions, however, is a critical skill that is desperately needed in a culture which requires constant innovations.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Asking Great Questions
7. Technology Skills: Almost every business that I talked to said that employers will need to be skilled at using technology. In the digital age, technology is everywhere. Schools, however, have been slow to adapt to this change. Rarely are students required or taught to learn technology efficiently. This needs to be emphasized.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Building Your Technology Skills
8. Creativity and Innovation: This skill is mentioned often. I believe that it correlates with the ability to ask good questions and the ability to problem solve. Employers will be looking to employees more and more for creative and innovative solutions to issues that exist.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Creative Thinking
9. Soft Skills: Schools rarely spend time teaching students soft skills, including skills such as time management skills, organizational skills, the ability to look someone in the eyes when talking to them, or using a firm handshake. I have heard a number of times, by different business leaders, that these skills seem to be disappearing.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Personal Effectiveness Tips
10. Empathy and Perspective: Although this skill has always been important, it seems to be another one that is slowly disappearing. The ability for our students to put themselves in someone else’s shoes, to understand their feelings, and to help solve their problems.
- Recommended LinkedIn Learning Course: Communicating With Empathy
The Action
Although it is important for our students to learn a core set of knowledge, we are not helping them develop these 10 skills by simply requiring them to regurgitate facts in an attempt to earn grades for a course. We need to have students apply what they are learning by engaging them in projects. We need to engage them in higher-order thinking skills in order for them to develop the skills that will be critical to their future success. Bloom’s Taxonomy provides a great illustration of the different levels of thinking. As educators, we need to stop depending on the lower level skills, such as memorization and recall, and help students develop higher-order thinking skills such as applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
Then, and only then, will we be helping students to develop these skills. Most educators that I have spoken with agree with this analysis. There is one question that seems to always arise, however: In order to help students develop these skills, what type of projects and assessments can we engage them in?
That question will be the focus of my next post on this topic.
Tick mk nha
With the help of the Internet, students can learn more effectively.
Many people may agree that the Internet and the airplane are the most sensational invention in the earth. Moreover, the Internet is becoming a representative living tool to human in that it makes possible for people to share of information. Especially, aspects of education, I strongly believe that the Internet is a prudent solution about a cost of social problem which is over concentrating on private classes. Also, it can support students in terms of study methods.
To start with, it is one of the advantages of the Internet to communicate with people who live other countries and to share their perperites. It is evident that students can access a lot of studying materials, such as foreign languages, literatures and developed technologies. For instance, when I was a senior student at the university, must write paper for passing graduation exam. However, it was difficult to survey vast amounts of related articles and materials. At the same time, my academic advisor had recommended that it was more efficient way to use science web-sites which possess innumerable information about my subject. As a result, I could find quickly proper information at the Internet and graduated university successfully. Consequently, There is no debate about an application of the Internet that is the best way to learn knowledge.